Net Data Design, LLC Blog

There are times when a product that you use, like, program for and have become very familiar with begins to lose it’s luster. I’m speaking of a very well known CMS, who will at this point remain nameless. We’ll just refer to it as BrandX for now. That time comes when you have this “feeling” and its confirmed by a long-time good client. It’s at that point you know that ignoring it won’t make it go away.

Over the past year or so I have become more familiar with and almost comfortable with the LAMP stack (Linux, Apache, MySQL and PHP.) I have been a die-hard Microsoft developer and admit that my strength is in the IIS, MSSQL, and .NET stack. All developer have they’re comfort zone, but I digress. Lets talk Joomla!.

Lets start with the test server. It’s VM running Ubuntu 9.10 with the LAMP stack installed. A freshly downloaded copy of Joomla! 1.5 in place and the installation begins. Here is where some other CMS’s can take a lesson (including BrandX)! The installation was very straight forward and took literally a minute to complete! A few minor configuration settings,a database name, user and presto, your in business.

That was the easy part. Now what to do in this new interface? A new world compared to BrandX! As with any “new” product a learning curve is a certainty, but Joomla! is truly a whole new world. I’ll write back with my finding and I look forward tou your comments.

While there are some that say that a MySQL/InnoDB “monopoly” isn’t healthy in the long run. What is a bit puzzling is the Oracle acquisition of Innobase Oy (the makers of InnoDB) a few years ago. The question in regards to this acquisition is whether Oracle is serious about seeing MySQL grow and prosper, or was that a means to get a strangle-hold on a vital piece of MySQL?

To Oracle’s credit, they have published  a press release stating their commitments regarding their acquisition of MySQL by way of acquiring Sun. Personally, I’m not buying it.

For years Oracle worked, behind the scenes to discredit MySQL and tried hard to understand how their customers could ever consider using such an “immature” product instead of their lead product. In fact, it was so important to Oracle that they offered some very substantial discounts to customers who were using MySQL and Oracle. The good news is that this strategy didn’t work. MySQL had and has a staunch following that has always been a little leery of Oracle.

I’ve been a CTO at two locations that used Oracle and have found their practices to be cut-throat, sometimes bordering on ruthless. Is Oracle a serious threat to the open-source community? In my estimation, it certainly is, more than most of my colleagues, although a huge percentage of them would agree that this acquisition is not good for MySQL. Does Oracle participate in the open-source community? Sure, in a manner that supports themselves through commercial offerings. This is not the true spirit of open-source and leads to a slippery slope.

I’ve posted a poll on the right of this post, feel free to participate.